Redundant only if position no longer exists

An employer is entitled to manage its business as it sees fit. This may often lead to restructuring and positions held by an employee being changed or refocused. However, as the Employment Tribunal pointed out in a recent case, such a change or refocus does not necessarily mean that position held by the employee is redundant.

The Department for Courts employed David Cross as a Bailiff. This was a statutory position, and primarily involved Mr Cross enforcing fines.

The Department decided that it was necessary to change the way in which it enforced fines. The Courts were imposing more fines and the number of unpaid fines was growing at an alarming rate. The Department decided to refocus the duties of its Bailiffs so that, instead of enforcing fines, there was a greater emphasis on negotiating payment arrangements with offenders/debtors at an early stage.

The Department considered that this change in emphasis meant that the work required to be performed was substantially different to that performed by its Bailiffs, and was therefore a new position. It called the new positions "Collection Officer".

The Department declared Mr Cross and other Bailiffs to be redundant and invited them to apply to become a Collection Officer. Mr Cross applied, but was unsuccessful. He was later dismissed for redundancy.

Mr Cross took a personal grievance to the Employment Tribunal. He claimed, amongst other things, that the position of Collection Officer was essentially the same as that of Bailiff, and that the only difference was a change in emphasis or focus in respect of the duties to be carried out. The Department was therefore not justified in dismissing him for redundancy.

The Tribunal heard evidence that Collections Officers were sworn as Bailiffs and were still required to carry out the powers and functions of Bailiffs. The only differences between the two positions related to the change in emphasis from enforcing fines to negotiating payment arrangements, and changes to remuneration, hours of work, and the operation of particular systems.

The Tribunal held that the position of Collections Officer was substantially the same as that of Bailiff.

"There is no doubt in my mind that the change of emphasis in the position to one of negotiating payment arrangement is different to enforcement. However, I do not consider the objective or purpose of the position to be different. In other words, the job is still the collection of fines. This work is still required to be done. The change in emphasis may well require enhanced or different skills on the part of the Department's employees but this alone does not mean that the position is superfluous" the Tribunal said.

The Tribunal went on to hold that Mr Cross' redundancy was not genuine, and he was therefore unjustifiably dismissed. It awarded him $16,300 for lost wages plus $12,000 compensation for humiliation and distress.

The question whether or not an employee's duties/position is redundant depends on how substantial any changes made to the duties/position are. This is a matter of fact and degree and requires an objective assessment of the two positions. As this case shows, employers who are considering such changes are well advised to seek legal advice before making them and implementing any redundancies.

More employment law

Employment Law
Ace Payroll does not give legal advice but these employment law articles may assist more..
Minimum Wage
To check the current minimum wage, visit the New Zealand government website more..
90 Day Trial Periods
New employees can be on a trial period of up to 90 days more..
Daylight Saving
Daylight saving dates and handling related employment issues more..
Redundancy must be genuine
An employee can only be made redundant if their position no longer exists more..
Dismissal procedural fairness
An explanation of the meaning and importance of procedural fairness when terminating employees more..
Employee or contractor
Use this checklist to clarify the difference between an employee and a contractor more..
Contractors minimum wage
Contractors are not entitled to the minimum wage more..
Employee interview honesty
An employee must be honest at a job interview or risk subsequent dismissal more..
Employee deductions
Cannot make deductions without employee consent more..
Retreiving overpaid wages
An employer can retrieve overpaid wages if done correctly more..
Employment relationships
Make it clear when and how an offer of employment will be made more..
Terminated before started
Resigned from old job, then told new job no longer available more..
Video surveillance
The use of video surveillance by employers is common and legal more..
Host responsibility
Think about the safety of employees affected by alcohol at work functions more..
Failure to meet targets
An employee can be justifiably dismissed for failing to meet targets more..
Change pay frequency
Pay frequency can be changed if properly managed more..
Abandonment of employment
Must inquire into circumstances of worker's absence more..
Changed working hours
Redundancy possible if employee does not agree more..
Drivers license
Truck driver loses license. Dismissal fair and reasonable more..
Internet usage
You would be wise to have a policy for personal internet usage more..
Absent employees
Some tips on dealing with absent employees more..
Payment for Jury Service
There is no obligation on an employer to pay for jury service more..
Recruitment health questions
Health questions employers are entitled to ask prospective employees more..
Holiday And Leave Contents
Holiday pay, public holidays, sick and bereavement leave information more..
Alphabetical Index
The Ace Payroll alphabetical index provides links to all documentation more..
Ace Payroll FAQ Contents
All the most common Ace Payroll questions grouped by categories in a short table of key words more..